Skip to main content

168 ESTABLISHING “FACTS”


168          ESTABLISHING “FACTS”



In 1997, during his professorial lecture at the City College of Manila, Ambeth Ocampo, former Chairperson of the National Historical Commission (NHCP) said "Personally, I think this controversy like that of the site of the first mass -- Limasawa, Leyte or Masao, Butuan -- belongs in the basura (trash). But then, textbooks and quiz shows require definite answers. People want "facts" not lessons or perspectives."  Vicente Calibo de Jesus, a relentless researcher on the subject of the first “mass” disagrees. He said, “A historian has a moral obligation to Truth, and an ethical responsibility to his readers, domestic and global.”

There is also a claim that the first “mass” was actually in Bolinao, Pangasinan celebrated in 1324 by Odoric of Pordenone, OFM, also known as Odorico Mattiussi or Mattiuzzi, an Italian late-medieval Franciscan friar and missionary explorer, predating the mass held in 1521 by Ferdinand Magellan, which is generally regarded as the first mass in the Philippines. This claim presupposes that a mass was always celebrated upon landing by missionaries.

It is now 2018, and there are other disciplines that can collaborate the establishment of "facts" aside from Ambeth Ocampo, NHCP, or history books prescribed in Philippine schools. Land masses and geographical features do not change drastically, so it is possible to actually pinpoint exact locations of places mentioned in historical accounts. Institutions involved in map-making, geography and other disciplines can corroborate or totally debunk "facts" in history.

One of these institutions is the National Mapping and Resource Information Authority (NAMRIA), an attached agency of the Philippine government under the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) mandated to provide the public with map-making services and serves as the central mapping agency, depository, and distribution facility of natural resources data in the form of maps, charts, texts, and statistics. NAMRIA mapping vis-à-vis the coordinates given in the accounts of those who first recorded the “mass”, with due diligence in the review of other references, can identify with certainty, what happened, where and who did what.

Who killed Magellan?  There is a full account of the battle in The Voyage of Magellan, the Journal of Antonio Pigafetta (1969) translated by Paula Paige and other sources. According to this account:

“So many of them charged down upon us that they shot the captain through the right leg with a poisoned arrow….   Recognizing the captain, so many turned upon him that they knocked his helmet off his head twice, but he always stood firmly like a good knight, together with some others… An Indian hurled a bamboo spear into the captain's face, but the latter immediately killed him with his lance, which he left in the Indian's body. Then, trying to lay hand on sword, he could draw it out but halfway, because he had been wounded in the arm with a bamboo spear. When the natives saw that, they all hurled themselves upon him. One of them wounded him on the left leg with a large cutlass, which resembles a scimitar, only being larger. That caused the captain to fall face downward, when immediately they rushed upon him with iron and bamboo spears and with their cutlasses, until they killed our mirror, our light, our comfort, and our true guide. When they wounded him, he turned back many times to see whether we were all in the boats. Thereupon, beholding him dead, we, wounded, retreated, as best we could, to the boats, which were already pulling off."

This account says, “they” and not one person. Historians must be open to the revision of “facts”, as other sources come to the fore, and as technology continues to advance and make available tools that can be used to inform prescribed “facts” peddled as truth by those who decide which “facts” will be taught in schools.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Armi

Published by  Sunday Punch Dagupan Pangasinan   July 23, 2019 Armi By Virginia Jasmin Pasalo It is not clear to me how I first met Armi Bangsal. I had this impression that she was introduced by Enoch Tan, but I could be wrong. Maybe she was introduced to me by another friend, Josefina (Josie) Lolarga. I have a clearer memory of how I met another friend, Fe Mangahas, from a timeline she remembers, which became the basis of my recall of the occasion. However, the clarity of our memory recedes over time, and with it, modifications of the stories, and so I think there may be an earlier event where we had met, which escaped her memory. Armi and I stayed close friends up to this day, seeing each other occasionally, sometimes only during Christmas and her birthday, and mourning the passing of other friends. I saw her more often during the last few years, because of the meetings scheduled by the Pangasinan Historical and Cultural Commission in Lingayen, where she res...
Post a Comment
Read more

155 INDEPENDENCE DAY

155           INDEPENDENCE DAY I had lunch with an old friend at Chocolate Kiss on Independence Day. We talked about our relationships and how we, considering our advocacy on women empowerment and environmental coexistence, experienced independence, codependence and interdependence.   “Alam mo, nakakapagod din. Buong buhay ko, nag-aalaga akong tao.” (You know, it is also tiring. All my life I have been taking care of people.) “Come to think of it, tama ka. Ganyan din ako.” (you are right. I am like that too.) “Sana sa next life, tayo rin ang alagaan.” (Hoping in the next life, we are the ones being cared for.) “Why in the next life? We can make steps to realize this, in this lifetime. And we can pray to God to make this happen.” “I miss him. It’s been years since I was pampered that way. He knows what I need before I even utter it. Sometimes, even before I think of it.” “In a way, we are lucky. At least ...
Post a Comment
Read more