Tourism and
Waste Matters
By Virginia Jasmin Pasalo
Pangasinan has
prepared a draft Provincial Tourism Development Framework Plan 2019-2025 which
was presented to the members of the Provincial Tourism Development Planning
Committee created under Executive Order 0068-2018. I am a member of this
committee, but I was not able to attend this very important workshop held 27
May 2019.
The workshop “presented
the working draft of the Plan, particularly with regards to the principles and
directions of development it espouses, and the set of Programs, Projects, and
Activities (PPAs) that it firmly considers would bring about the objectives
that have been set for Tourism Development in the province.” The committee was
tasked “to go over the plan and provide necessary corrections and input
elements that reflect the roles and concerns” of particular sectors “that may
have been overlooked or have become relevant to date.”
I was promised a
soft copy of this plan, but I have not received any to date, so I would tackle
one of the concerns I have initially wanted to take up, which may have already
been diligently poured over by the members of the committee present in the
meeting.
Tourism can mean
many good things for the economy of a growing province, but it can also put a
strain on already scarce resources such as energy, water, food and land. It can cause an increase in pollution and change in the
topography of tourism sites due to the construction of support facilities for projects in target areas. Tourists can also
violate the integrity of the environment without the proper ordinances and
cultural orientation that guarantee proper behavior.
A critical concern
in preserving the integrity of natural resources is to calculate how much waste
(especially plastic waste) will be generated by tourism activities, taking into
account the projected number of tourists in certain sites and providing local
infrastructure, both physical and social, commensurate to the waste they are
expected to generate. The choice of the projects should also be consistent with
the framework of sustainability and ecological balance.
In a 2015 report,
the Philippines was ranked as the “third largest source of discarded plastic
that ends up in the ocean” by the Ocean Conservancy Charity and the McKinsey
Centre for Business and Environment. The country generates “2.7 million tonnes
of plastic waste annually and 20 per cent – or half a million tonnes – of that
leaks into the oceans.” There is no specific study for the provinces, but it
would be easy to calculate an estimate considering these figures vis-à-vis the
2019 population of the Philippines (108.11 million), and other available data
that would enhance the accuracy of the projections at the local level to gain
insights on the extent and impact of tourism activities on Pangasinan’s
environment and natural resources.
Therefore, a tourism
plan should be based on solid data to support initiatives which can mean: the
construction of viable waste disposal systems, educating the population,
orienting the tourists, formulating ordinances that encourage appropriate
incentives for good business practices, tax incentives and profit-sharing
schemes particularly with communities hosting the projects.
Lastly, since
Pangasinan derives its essence from salt, which is derived from the West
Philippine Sea, there must be a plan to monitor its shores so that plastic
waste will not exacerbate the quality of the salt, which is already compromised
worldwide.
Comments
Post a Comment